Federal R&D Tax Credit Services

Federal R&D Tax Credit Services for Engineering-Driven Companies

We help software, aerospace, manufacturing, AI, and technology companies identify, document, and defend federal R&D tax credits under Internal Revenue Code Section 41 through a CPA-led, flat-fee advisory model.

Meet with Chris Peters
July 2026
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
Select a date to open Chris's booking calendar
Section 174 Basics

What Is Section 174?

Section 174 of the Internal Revenue Code governs how businesses treat research and experimental expenditures for tax purposes.

Historically, businesses could immediately deduct qualified research expenses in the year they were incurred.

Beginning with tax years after December 31, 2021, companies are now generally required to capitalize and amortize these costs over multiple years rather than deducting them immediately.

This change has created significant tax implications for innovation-driven businesses.

Why It Matters

Why Section 174 Matters

For many technology companies, Section 174 has become one of the most significant tax changes in recent years.

The capitalization requirement can result in:

  • Higher taxable income
  • Increased federal tax liability
  • Reduced cash flow
  • More complex tax reporting requirements
  • Additional accounting and compliance burdens

Many software and engineering companies have experienced unexpected tax obligations as a result of these changes.

Eligibility

Section 174 vs R&D Tax Credit

One of the biggest misconceptions is assuming Section 174 and the R&D tax credit are the same thing.

They are related but serve very different purposes.

Category

Section 174

Section 41 R&D Credit

Purpose

Expense capitalization rules    

Tax incentive

Required?

Yes

Optional

Benefit Type    

Expense treatment

Tax credit

Applies To

Broad R&D activities

Qualified research activities

IRS Focus

Expense allocation

Credit qualification

Many companies are subject to both simultaneously.

Driving Growth Through Strategic Clarity

Which Expenses Fall Under Section 174?

Software Development Cost

Product development Feature development Platform improvements Architecture redesign Internal software development

Engineering Payroll

Software engineers Developers Engineering managers Technical architects

Contractor Costs

Third-party developers Engineering consultants Technical specialists

Prototype Cost

Product design Testing activities Engineering experiments

Cloud Infrastructure Costs

In certain situations, development-related cloud expenses may qualify.

Call Us Today to Schedule a Free Consultation

Common Section 174 Challenges

Identifying Eligible Costs

Many companies struggle to determine which expenses fall within Section 174.

Allocation Across Teams

Engineering personnel often split time between qualifying and non-qualifying activities.

Documentation Requirements

Proper documentation is critical for defensibility.

Software Development Complexity

Modern software organizations often have highly integrated development teams that complicate cost allocation.

Multi-State Operations

Remote engineering teams create additional complexity.

How We Work

Our Section 174 Calculation Process

At our company, every project begins with a deep understanding of your unique needs. We believe that a successful partnership is built on transparent communication, collaborative innovation, and a methodical approach that transforms challenges into measurable results.

01
Discovery Call
Understand your engineering organization and accounting structure.
02
Expense Identification
Review payroll, contractors, and development costs.
03
Cost Allocation
Allocate qualifying expenses based on activities performed.
04
Amortization Calculation
Prepare domestic and foreign amortization schedules.
05
Documentation Preparation
Create supporting documentation for the calculation methodology.

Flat fee vs. contingency pricing

Two common ways R&D credit studies get priced — and why the structure you choose affects far more than the invoice.

Category Flat fee model Contingency model
Pricing predictability Yes No
Fee increases with credit size No Yes
Alignment around defensibility High Variable
Long-term cost efficiency High Lower
Upfront cost Higher Lower
$10K

Most federal studies are completed for a flat fee of approximately $10,000, allowing clients to retain the full value of increasing credits as they scale.

Deliverables

Why Companies Choose Us

Section 174 has become highly technical and requires specialized knowledge.

We understand software development lifecycles and engineering organizations.

Led by a California and Nevada CPA with advanced tax specialization.

We work directly with finance and engineering teams throughout the engagement.

Quarterly check-ins help simplify future compliance.

FAQ

Is Section 174 mandatory?

Yes. For companies with qualifying expenditures, compliance is generally required.

Yes. Software development is one of the most common areas impacted.

No. Section 174 governs expense treatment while the R&D tax credit provides incentives.

Yes. Many companies are affected by both.

As of today, the capitalization requirements remain in effect, although legislative proposals continue to be discussed.

Insights & Success Stories

Expert Strategies, Industry Trends & Real Results

Stay ahead with the latest business insights, success stories, and industry trends. Explore expert advice, real-world case studies, and actionable strategies to drive growth and innovation in your business.
Find Out Whether Your Company Qualifies

Schedule a discovery call to determine eligibility and receive a preliminary estimate of your opportunity.

Stay Ahead.

Subscribe for Expert Insights.

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in the footer of our emails. View our Privacy Policy.